<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.7916/py9d-j319</dc:identifier><dc:title>Document, 1785 May 08</dc:title><dc:format>correspondence</dc:format><dc:type>text</dc:type><dc:subject>United States--History--Revolution, 1775-1783</dc:subject><dc:subject>Jay, John, 1745-1829</dc:subject><dc:description>Ministry of Gr Britain will no doubt find Adams' letters of credence and
            commission sufficient authority, but as shown by a letter from the Duke of Dorset, Br
            cabinet doubt whether Congress have power to treat of commercial treaties. Adams
            supposes cabinet have put an "erroneous construction" upon the limitation article in
            confederation, anticipates difficulty and delay from this limitation. Proposes states
            confer upon Congress a power to make treaties of commerce either unlimited in time or
            limited in regard to single nations. Adams hopes to convince cabinet of necessity of
            surrender of posts, explanation of debts, restitution of Negroes. Despite prosperous
            period last year Us trade has been discouraged. America ought to attend to strength and
            defense; our situation is different than that in Europe, where countries can depend on
            mutual defense from neighbors, but the United States will become so strong in time no
            nation will feel it necessary to aid her in war. The strongest ties should be knit:
            systemized commerce and trade in for treaties</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>