<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.7916/d3t9-j765</dc:identifier><dc:title>Document, 1770 n.d. - 1775 n.d.</dc:title><dc:format>correspondence</dc:format><dc:type>text</dc:type><dc:subject>United States--History--Revolution, 1775-1783</dc:subject><dc:subject>Jay, John, 1745-1829</dc:subject><dc:description>Question on the allocation of fees in two cases of ejectment brought
            before the Supreme Court of Judicature. The same witnesses and surveys were required in
            each case. The Chief Justice has asked Jay and six other "Practisers" to give their
            opinion on whether the fees involved should all be charged to the defendant in the first
            case tried, or divided between the two defendants, or to be charged in full to both. Jay
            and his colleagues agree that the cases should be considered "as entirely distinct,
            &amp; that the Costs be taxed accordingly." Document signed by Jay, Robert R.
            Livingston, Jr., Peter Van Schaack, Richard Morris, Samuel Jones, William Wickham,
            Rudolphus Ritzema.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>